Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The unusual luminescence behavior of the two-coordinate gold(I) carbene complex, [Au[C(NHMe)(2)](2)](PF(6)) x 0.5(acetone), is reported. Upon freezing in a liquid N(2) bath, the colorless, nonluminescent solutions of [Au[C(NHMe)(2)](2)](PF(6)) x 0.5(acetone) become intensely luminescent. Strikingly, the colors of the emission differ in different solvents and appear only after the solvent has frozen. Solid [Au[C(NHMe)(2)](2)](PF(6)) x 0.5(acetone) is also luminescent, and the luminescence is attributed to the formation of extended chains of gold(I) centers that are connected through aurophilic attractions. Crystallographic studies of [Au[C(NHMe)(2)](2)](PF(6)) x 0.5(acetone) and [Au[C(NHMe)(2)](2)](BF(4)), which is also luminescent, reveal that both involve extended chains of cations and that the anions are hydrogen bonded to the cations through cation N-H groups. However, these chains differ in the Au...Au separations in each and in the carbene ligand orientations. In contrast, [Au[C(NMe(2))(NHMe)](2)](PF(6)) forms a colorless, nonluminescent solid, and in that solid there are no Au...Au interactions, a factor which supports the contention that aggregated species are responsible for the luminescence of [Au[C(NHMe)(2)](2)](PF(6)) x 0.5(acetone) in the solid state and in frozen solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White-Morris et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: