Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents first steps towards robust models for crisis prediction. We conduct a horse race of conventional statistical methods and more recent machine learning methods as early-warning models. As individual models are in the literature most often built in isolation of other methods, the exercise is of high relevance for assessing the relative performance of a wide variety of methods. Further, we test various ensemble approaches to aggregating the information products of the built models, providing more robust basis for measuring country-level vulnerabilities. Finally, we provide approaches to estimating model uncertainty in early-warning exercises, particularly model performance uncertainty and model output uncertainty. The approaches put forward in this paper are shown with Europe as a playground. Generally, our results show that the conventional statistical approaches are outperformed by more advanced machine learning methods, such as k-nearest neighbours and neural networks, and particularly by model aggregation approaches through ensemble learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holopainen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: