Methodological analysis reveals biological pitfalls in standard single-cell RNA-seq workflows, suggesting that routine mathematical assumptions obscure subtle cellular signals.
Processing biological data is a challenge of paramount importance as the amount of accumulated data has been annually increasing along with the emergence of new methods for studying biological objects. Blind application of mathematical methods in biology may lead to erroneous hypotheses and conclusions. Here we narrow our focus down to a small set of mathematical methods applied upon standard processing of scRNA-seq data: preprocessing, dimensionality reduction, integration, and clustering (using machine learning methods for clustering). Normalization and scaling are standard manipulations for the pre-processing with LogNormalize (natural-log transformation), CLR (centered log ratio transformation), and RC (relative counts) being employed as methods for data transformation. The justification for applying these methods in biology is not discussed in methodological articles. The essential aspect of dimensionality reduction is to identify the stable patterns which are deliberately removed upon mathematical data processing as being redundant, albeit containing important minor details for biological interpretation. There are no established rules for integration of datasets obtained at different sampling times or conditions. Clustering calls for reconsidering its application specifically for biological data processing. The novelty of the present study lies in an integrated approach of biology and bioinformatics to elucidate biological insights upon data processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arbatsky et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: