Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This revision to the EEG Guidelines is an update incorporating current electroencephalography technology and practice and was previously published as Guideline 5. While the 10-10 system of electrode position nomenclature has been accepted internationally for almost two decades, it has not been used universally. The reasons for this and clinical scenarios when the 10-10 system provides additional localizing information are discussed in this revision. In addition, situations in which AF1/2, AF5/6, PO1/2 and PO5/6 electrode positions may be utilized for EEG recording are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: