Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 1, 2006Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques

Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Open Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Retraction Pressure Studies

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KSKathryn J. StevensStanford MedicineDSDavid B. SpencinerSynlab Czech (Czechia)KGKaren L. GriffithsStanford Medicine

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Stevens et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69deb6ca4838c5c0bab0ccbbhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000193820.42522.d9
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histologic Evidence of Postoperative Back Muscle Injury in Rats2000 · 72 citations
  2. 2The Lumbar Mamillo-Accessory Ligament1981 · 77 citations
  3. 3Long-Term Strength Assessment of Postoperative Diskectomy Patients1989 · 44 citations
  4. 4Anterior/Posterior Lumbar Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Analysis of Complications and Predictive Factors2001 · 190 citations
  5. 5Back Muscle Injury After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery1996 · 361 citations