PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 16, 2016British Journal of Haematology54 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of primary refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with salvage chemotherapy and intention to transplant in the rituximab era

View Full Paper
SVSantosha A. VardhanaCSCraig S. SauterMMMatthew J. Matasar

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Rituximab-containing salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in chemosensitive patients remains the standard of care for patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its role in those patients achieving less than a complete response to first-line therapy (primary refractory disease) in the rituximab era is not well defined. We reviewed the outcomes of 82 transplant-eligible patients with primary refractory DLBCL who underwent salvage therapy with the intent of administering high-dose therapy and ASCT to patients achieving chemosensitive remission. The estimated 3-year overall and progression-free survival for all patients was 38% and 29%, respectively, and 65% and 60% respectively for patients proceeding to stem cell transplant. Long-term remission was achieved in 45% of patients achieving a partial response (PR) to initial induction therapy and <20% of patients with stable or progression of disease following initial therapy. These results suggest that salvage chemotherapy with the intent of subsequent high-dose therapy and ASCT remains a feasible strategy in certain patients with primary refractory DLBCL, particularly for those achieving a PR to frontline therapy. The primary barrier to curative therapy in patients with primary refractory disease is resistance to salvage therapy, and future studies should be aimed towards increasing the response rate in this population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vardhana et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69decc2040ea065679559955https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14453
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ofatumumab Versus Rituximab Salvage Chemoimmunotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The ORCHARRD Study2017 · 238 citations
  2. 2Outcome of patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who fail second-line salvage regimens in the International CORAL study2015 · 318 citations
  3. 3Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant in primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: outcomes and prognostic factors2011 · 47 citations
  4. 4Salvage Regimens With Autologous Transplantation for Relapsed Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era2010 · 1,639 citations
  5. 5High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation after Failure of Conventional Chemotherapy in Adults with Intermediate-Grade or High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma1987 · 784 citations