• Multiobjective model predictive current control. • Correction coefficient matrix. • Comprehensive evaluation of power quality. This paper proposes a model predictive control (MPC)-based power quality optimization method designed to enhance the low-voltage ride-through (LVRT) capability of grid-connected inverters under various grid voltage sag conditions, while achieving multi-objective power quality optimization. Traditional PI/PR current loop control structures, which rely on positive and negative sequence separation, suffer from issues such as filtering delays, complex parameter tuning, and performance degradation due to deteriorated power quality, adversely affecting the ride-through process. The proposed method eliminates the need for current positive and negative sequence separation and filtering voltage feedforward processing, effectively preventing overcurrent during deep voltage sags (0.1 per unit). It establishes a general formula for calculating the reference current for power/current quality optimization in the αβ axis. By directly adjusting the correction coefficient matrix, the method enables seamless switching and unified optimized control among power fluctuation, negative sequence current, and harmonic current. To quantitatively demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method, an evaluation framework based on the weighted rank sum ratio (WRSR) method is established. The results indicate a performance improvement of approximately 150 % compared to traditional methods within the optimal correction coefficient interval. The effectiveness of the proposed method under different grid fault sag conditions is validated through MATLAB simulations and the Starsim experimental platform. The results show that the proposed method exhibits excellent dynamic performance, with a settling time of about 10 ms, significantly enhancing the LVRT capability of grid-connected inverters and meeting grid code requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: