⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

July 1, 2025JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics

Assessing the Data Quality Dimensions of Surgical Oncology Cohorts in the All of Us Research Program

Henry M. Spotnitz John Giannini Emily Clark Yechiam Ostchega Tamara R. Litwin Stephanie L. Goff Lewis E. Berman

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

We identified multiple data completeness issues, which limited the fitness for use evaluation. Also, using the OMOP CDM procedure concepts and mappings presented challenges for our study. Variable amounts of missingness in OMOP CDM surgical oncology data may affect the fitness for use of cancer data. Further research is warranted to improve the quality of that data.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Spotnitz et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69defbf6499d77a496b0d500 https://doi.org/10.1200/cci-25-00078

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Assessing the Data Quality Dimensions of Partial and Complete Mastectomy Cohorts in the All of Us Research Program: A Cross-Sectional Study (Preprint)2024
2Adoption of the OMOP CDM for Cancer Research using Real-world Data: Current Status and Opportunities2024 · 3 citations
3Application of a Data Quality Framework to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Electronic Health Record Data From the <i>All of Us</i> Research Program2024 · 5 citations
4Data Quality in Medical Real-World Data – An Oncological Use Case2024 · 3 citations
5The OMOP common data model in Australian primary care data: Building a quality research ready harmonised dataset2024 · 15 citations