Professional cyclists adjust their pedalling cadence based on the competition phase, adopting higher cadences during flat and time trial phases compared to high mountain phases.
Supports phase-specific cadence coaching; hypothesis-generating for performance effects of economical rates in mountains.
During both F and TT, professional riders spontaneously adopt higher cadences (around 90 rpm) than those previously reported in the majority of laboratory studies as being the most economical. In contrast, during HM they seem to adopt a more economical pedalling rate (approximately 70 rpm), possibly as a result of the specific demands of this competition phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: