Why the study?
Does 4D-flow CMR reveal different aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps between RL-BAV and RN-BAV phenotypes?
Does 4D-flow CMR reveal different aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps between RL-BAV and RN-BAV phenotypes?
Different BAV phenotypes exhibit distinct flow patterns and wall shear stress profiles on 4D-flow CMR, potentially explaining different aortic dilatation morphotypes.
May inform phenotype-specific BAV aortopathy risk stratification; hypothesis-generating for 4D-flow CMR-guided surveillance pending longitudinal data.
Different BAV-phenotypes present different flow patterns with an anterior distribution in RL-BAV, whereas, RN-BAV patients present a predominant posterior outflow jet at the sinotubular junction that shifts to anterior or right anterior in mid and distal AAo. Thus, RL-BAV patients present a higher axial WSS at the aortic root while RN-BAV present a higher circumferential WSS in mid and distal AAo. These results may explain different AAo dilatation morphotypes in the BAV population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez‐Palomares et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: