PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2019JCI Insight213 citationsOpen Access

Human primary liver cancer organoids reveal intratumor and interpatient drug response heterogeneity

View Full Paper
LLLing LiJohns Hopkins UniversityHKHildur KnútsdóttirdeCODE Genetics (Iceland)KHKen HuiAgency for Science, Technology and Research

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Liver cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality and is distinguished by a relative paucity of chemotherapy options. It has been hypothesized that intratumor genetic heterogeneity may contribute to the high failure rate of chemotherapy. Here, we evaluated functional heterogeneity in a cohort of primary human liver cancer organoid lines. Each primary human liver cancer surgical specimen was used to generate multiple cancer organoid lines, obtained from distinct regions of the tumor. A total of 27 liver cancer lines were established and tested with 129 cancer drugs, generating 3,483 cell survival data points. We found a rich intratumor, functional (drug response) heterogeneity in our liver cancer patients. Furthermore, we established that the majority of drugs were either ineffective, or effective only in select organoid lines. In contrast, we found that a subset of drugs appeared pan-effective, displaying at least moderate activity in the majority of these cancer organoid lines. These drugs, which are FDA approved for indications other than liver cancers, deserve further consideration as either systemic or local therapeutics. Of note, molecular profiles, obtained for a reduced sample set, did not correlate with the drug response heterogeneity of liver cancer organoid lines. Taken together, these findings lay the foundation for in-depth studies of pan-effective drugs, as well as for functional personalized oncology approaches. Lastly, these functional studies demonstrate the utility of cancer organoid drug testing as part of a drug discovery pipeline.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df1060de200760a86143fehttps://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.121490
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine for Biliary Tract Cancer2010 · 4,478 citations
  2. 2Cytokeratin 7 and Cytokeratin 20 Expression in Epithelial Neoplasms: A Survey of 435 Cases2000 · 1,053 citations
  3. 3Exome sequencing identifies frequent inactivating mutations in BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas2013 · 718 citations
  4. 4A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays1999 · 7,005 citations
  5. 5Molecular mechanisms of cell death: central implication of ATP synthase in mitochondrial permeability transition2014 · 338 citations