Why the study?
Women are generally underrepresented in aortic aneurysm trials, leaving it unclear whether sex affects outcomes after complex endovascular aortic repair.
Does female sex affect operative outcomes and reinterventions in patients receiving complex endovascular aortic repair?
Does female sex affect operative outcomes and reinterventions in patients receiving complex endovascular aortic repair?
Female patients undergoing complex endovascular aortic repair have significantly lower technical success rates compared to matched male patients, likely due to more complex anatomy.
Women may have lower technical success with complex EVAR; this cohort finding leaves open whether sex-specific strategies improve outcomes.
Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysms. Aiming to assess whether sex may affect outcomes after a complex endovascular aortic repair, a propensity score selection was applied to a total population of 596 patients receiving F/BEVAR aortic repair with the Cook platform, matching each treated female patient with a corresponding male patient. Women presented more frequently a thoracoabdominal aneurysm extent, smaller visceral vessels, and complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success versus 96.6% (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of short-term and mid-term reinterventions. According to these results, careful and critical assessment should be posed in case of female patients receiving complex aortic repair, especially regarding preoperative anatomical evaluation and clinical selection with appropriate surgical risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isernia et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: