Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis revealed CRS/HIPEC to be safe, often safer across the spectrum of NSQIP safety metrics when compared with similar-risk oncologic procedures. Patient selection was important in achieving observed outcomes. High complication rates are a misperception from early CRS/HIPEC experience and should no longer deter referral of patients to experienced centers or impede clinical trial development in the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foster et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: