Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The shuttling effect of lithium polysulfide (LiPS), which leads to the gravest capacity degradation, is one of the critical problems to hindering the commercialization of lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs). Here, collectively exhaustive Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene and graphene oxide (GO) multilayers are reported to suppress the shuttling effect by utilizing both physical inhibition of micro/mesoporous and chemical absorption of surface functional groups. The abundant surface functional groups of GO and MXene attract the positively charged lithium ion (Li + ) and eject the negatively charged polysulfides (S n 2– ) through electrostatic affinity and repulsion. A simple approach using vacuum filtration is utilized to encapsulate elemental sulfur (S 8 ) between GO and MXene film (GSM), acting as a permselective separator and functionalized current collector, respectively. The functionally antagonistic GSM directly plays a role in a cathode for LSBs and exhibits a specific capacity of 1425 mAh g –1 at 0.1C in the initial cycle. The abundant functional groups, which can chemisorb the LiPSs, result in a high cyclic retention of ≈85.1% after 500 cycles. Furthermore, a flexible LSB is demonstrated with a PEO‐LiTFSI electrolyte based on the flexibility of the exceptionally thin GSM due to the 2D nanomaterials, MXene and graphene oxide.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nam et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69df23e5b8d7e94566614ac2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202101025
Sanghee Nam
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Jaehwan Kim
University of Science and Technology
Van Hiep Nguyen
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Advanced Materials Technologies
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Kumoh National Institute of Technology
National NanoFab Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: