Reveals how bonding interactions shape solid-state structures of aryl halides in phosphonates, indicating their significance in material design.
The reaction of the aryllithium derivative 2,6‐[P(O)(O‐ i ‐Pr) 2 ] 2 ‐4‐ t ‐Bu‐C 6 H 2 Li with iodine chloride, ICl, and elemental bromine, Br 2 , respectively, gave the aryl halides 2,6‐[P(O)(O‐ i ‐Pr) 2 ] 2 ‐4‐ t ‐Bu‐C 6 H 2 X ( 1 , X = I; 2 , X = Br, respectively). The aryl iodide 1 was characterized by 1 H, 13 C, 31 P NMR, and IR spectroscopy, and both 1 and the water solvate 2 ·H 2 O by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The structure of 1 in the solid state revealed weak inter‐ and intramolecular P =O···I–Ar electrostatic halogen bonding (HaB) interactions, resulting in 1 being a dimer in the solid state. In solution, however, it is a monomer. For the sake of comparison, the solid‐state structure of the aryl bromide derivative 2,6[P(O)(O‐ i ‐Pr) 2 ] 2 ‐4‐ t ‐Bu‐C 6 H 2 Br·H 2 O ( 2 ·H 2 O) is also reported, revealing a polymeric 2D structure as a result of P O···HOH···OP hydrogen bonds (HBs) and weak intermolecular P( i ‐Pr)O···BrAr HaB interactions. Natural bonding orbital (NBO) and quantum theory of atoms in molecule (QTAIM)/density functional theory (DFT) calculations helped elucidating the nature of the interactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mroß et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: