This analysis explores cause-specific morbidity between genders, indicating urban areas benefited from better living conditions.
This paper uses data from a nationwide Swedish health insurance society (1912–1914) to explore how gendered rural and urban living conditions shaped morbidity during a period characterized by the epidemiological transition and an urban penalty in mortality. Infectious diseases were more common in rural areas, driving the urban–rural morbidity gap. Urban regions experienced less sickness episodes due to lower fertility and pregnancy-related illnesses among women and safer workplaces for men. The findings suggest that urban areas led the epidemiological transition, with urban populations benefiting from more favorable living conditions, while rural populations experienced a rural penalty in morbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eriksson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: