Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective evaluation reveals distinct driving factors and outcomes in ESBL-producing enterobacterales infections, suggesting targeted interventions.
Objectives The aim of this study was to identify factors contributing to distinct carbapenem-resistant phenotypes and associated healthcare utilization and outcomes in patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (EC) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) with or without evolved carbapenem-heteroresistance (cHR) or -resistance (CR). Methods A retrospective longitudinal evaluation of patients with repeated isolation of clonally related EC or KP during separate encounters. Patients were grouped by carbapenem susceptibility trajectory: (1) ESBL-ESBL; (2) ESBL-cHR; and (3) ESBL-CR. Groups were compared for host and microbial characteristics, antimicrobial exposure, and outcomes. Results 30 patients (14 ESBL-ESBL, 9 ESBL-cHR, and 7 ESBL-CR) contributed 111 encounters involving 55 EC and 56 KP. Carbapenem-resistant groups demonstrated significantly greater need for feeding tubes and central venous catheters, particularly after resistance evolved from ESBL. The ESBL-CR group was primarily involved by KP from wound and respiratory sites, whereas the ESBL-ESBL and ESBL-cHR groups were predominantly EC from urine and blood. Compared to the ESBL-ESBL group, the ESBL-CR group had the most healthcare visits, whereas the ESBL-cHR group had the longest intervals between visits. Following resistance evolution, hospitalization duration increased by 3 and 1 day, respectively, for ESBL-CR and ESBL-cHR groups (P = 0.01), while the ESBL-cHR group experienced more ICU admissions and septic shock. The ESBL-CR group had the highest overall antimicrobial and carbapenem exposure, while the ESBL-cHR group had the lowest. Conclusions Evolution from ESBL to carbapenem-resistant phenotypes appeared organism-specific, as EC showed patterns consistent with cHR emergence over longer intervals and lower carbapenem exposure, whereas KP more often progressed to CR from non-urinary sources with greater healthcare utilization. If confirmed in a larger cohort, these observations may inform organism-specific stewardship strategies, enhanced diagnostics for ESBL-cHR, and further investigation into non-antibiotic mechanisms driving heteroresistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kruse et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: