Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis evaluates dimensional accuracy in lattice structures, suggesting optimal design parameters for manufacturing.
Additive manufacturing of lattice structures offers superior lightweight and energy-absorbing properties across aviation, automotive, and biomedical sectors. However, achieving dimensional precision remains a primary obstacle to ensuring design compatibility and product functionality. To address this challenge, this study introduces a novel comparative analysis of BCC, Diamond, and Octet Truss geometries, specifically focusing on the interplay between infill density and strut thickness. By evaluating PLA-fabricated plates with thicknesses of 0.8 mm, 1 mm, and 1.2 mm through microscopic CAD-to-print comparison, the research identifies critical accuracy thresholds. Findings demonstrate that higher infill ratios significantly enhance structural stability; notably, Octet Truss structures exhibited substantially lower dimensional deviations (0.694%–1.923%) compared to BCC structures (1.25%–3.546%). Furthermore, increasing strut thickness to 1.2 mm reduced deviation rates by up to 50% compared to 0.8 mm struts. These results provide a significant resource for optimizing additive manufacturing parameters, offering new insights into achieving high-precision fabrication for complex lattice systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uzunyol et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: