PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology2 citations

Conduction System Versus Biventricular Pacing in Pacing‐Induced Cardiomyopathy: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
QJQing JinXRXingbiao RenHWHaiyan Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare conduction system pacing and biventricular pacing in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis

Structured PICO

Does conduction system pacing improve electrical synchrony and clinical outcomes compared to biventricular pacing in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy?

P
Population
Patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM)
I
Intervention
Conduction system pacing (CSP)
C
Comparator
Biventricular pacing
O
Outcome
Electrical synchrony, response rates, and adverse outcomes

Upgrading to conduction system pacing in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy improves electrical synchrony and clinical outcomes compared to biventricular pacing.

Abstract

The results indicate that upgrading to CSP in PICM patients significantly improves electrical synchrony, and correlates with higher response rates and lower adverse outcomes, suggesting CSP as a promising alternative pacing strategy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b49e4eeef8a2a6b0326https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70243
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper