This commentary explores the representation of LGBTQ+ victims in domestic violence fatality reviews, indicating implications for broader responses to domestic abuse.
This paper is a commentary on the (in)visibility of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer (LGBTQ+) victims in Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews (DVFRs). Drawing on a practitioner–researcher perspective and a case study of Domestic Homicide Reviews (DHRs) in England and Wales, this paper’s originality stems from the author’s practitioner–researcher perspective. LGBTQ+ lives can be made (in)visible as a result of how in-scope deaths are identified, whether knowledge and expertise are included, and because of how the lives of LGBTQ+ victims are represented. This commentary explores how DVFRs can make LGBTQ+ lives (in)visible. Critically, however, it identifies how these considerations relate to broader questions, including the responses to LGBTQ+ domestic abuse generally and the functioning of DVFRs specifically, and also has implications for how researchers use the findings of review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Rowlands (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: