PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society5 citationsOpen Access

colibre : calibrating subgrid feedback in cosmological simulations that include a cold gas phase

View Full Paper
ECEvgenii ChaikinJSJoop SchayeMSMatthieu Schaller

Key Points

  • This research aims to calibrate feedback mechanisms in the colibre model to enhance predictions for galaxy formation.
  • Calibrated colibre model at three resolutions: m7, m6, and m5.
  • Performed approximately 200 simulations using Latin hypercube sampling to vary subgrid parameters.
  • Trained Gaussian process emulators to predict galaxy mass functions and size relations based on model parameters.
  • Successfully matched observed galaxy stellar mass functions and size-stellar mass relations with a calibrated m7 model.
  • Demonstrated that a simple supernova feedback model works individually but not simultaneously for all metrics.
  • Model predictions matched other galaxy properties outside of the calibration targets.

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present the calibration of stellar and active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback in the subgrid model for the new colibre hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy formation. colibre directly simulates the multiphase interstellar medium and the evolution of dust grains, which is coupled to the chemistry. colibre is calibrated at three resolutions: particle masses of m ₆₀ₒ m ₃₌ 10⁷ (m7), 10⁶ (m6), and 10⁵\, M_ (m5). To calibrate the colibre feedback at m7 resolution, we run Latin hypercubes of 200 simulations that vary up to four subgrid parameters in cosmological volumes of (50\, cMpc) ^3. We train Gaussian process emulators on these simulations to predict the z=0 galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) and size–stellar mass relation (SSMR) as functions of the model parameters, which we then fit to observations. The trained emulators not only provide the best-fitting parameter values but also enable us to investigate how different aspects of the prescriptions for supernova and AGN feedback affect the predictions. In particular, we demonstrate that while the observed z=0 GSMF and SSMR can be matched individually with a relatively simple supernova feedback model, simultaneously reproducing both necessitates a more sophisticated prescription. We show that the calibrated m7 colibre model not only reproduces the calibration target observables, but also matches various other galaxy properties to which the model was not calibrated. Finally, we apply the calibrated m7 model to the m6 and m5 resolutions and, after slight manual adjustments of the subgrid parameters, achieve a similar level of agreement with the observed z=0 GSMF and SSMR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaikin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2bcae4eeef8a2a6b0c61https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag300
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper