Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis finds correlation between building intensity and green space accessibility, suggesting planning improvements for megacities.
Urban green space (UGS) is widely recognized as a core component of sustainable urban development in megacities. The study of the synergistic relationship between high-intensity urban development and daily accessibility of UGS, however, remains insufficient. This paper therefore critically assesses the inherent correlation between building intensity and the UGS daily accessibility in a typical megacity context. The analysis is twofold: What is the inherent correlation between building intensity and the daily accessibility of UGS in megacities? And, if such a correlation exists, how can daily accessibility be improved by integrating building intensity into the UGS planning process? Using a case study in Beijing, methods of multi-source data integration, GIS spatial analysis, and statistical correlation models are used to address the issues. Results indicate that building intensity exhibits a statistically positive spatial association with the Daily Accessibility Index (DAI). Mere expansion of the total UGS area does not necessarily lead to improved daily accessibility for residents. The findings include a clarified dual-effect mechanism of high-intensity development on UGS services, as well as evidence-based planning strategies for sustainable UGS layout in dense megacities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: