Research uncovers optimal R&D strategies and cost evaluations for centralized vehicle platforms, indicating industry needs.
The electronic and electrical architecture of vehicles has rapidly evolved to centralized. At present, there is no unified consensus on the R&D strategy of the platform in the industry, and there is also a lack of a quantitative decision-making framework that can be implemented. This study takes the centralized architecture platform as the research object, constructs a two-stage analysis framework of “advanced constraint screening-cost quantitative evaluation”, uses a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method to screen feasible R&D strategy combinations that meet the requirements of the architectural advancement, builds a total cost of ownership evaluation system around the software and hardware elements related to the architecture platform, and systematically analyzes the optimal cost R&D strategy combinations of car enterprises with different mass production scales under the two scenarios of Multi-Box and One-Board. The research results show that adaptive platform middleware and framework middleware are the core necessary elements to realize the advanced architecture; the amortization cost of architecture is negatively correlated with the scale of mass production, and the cost of in-house R&D is highly dependent on large-scale amortization; and there are differentiated optimal solutions in the framework selection and R&D strategy combination of automakers with different mass production scales. This study can provide quantitative reference and practical guidance for R&D decision making of centralized architecture platform for automakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: