Systematic review compares outcomes of non-intubated versus intubated anesthesia during VATS procedures, suggesting potential benefits.
SA is a feasible alternative to intubated GA for VATS spontaneous ventilation anesthesia, potentially reducing procedural time and LOS without raising complication risk. Applicability to U.S. practice requires caution, given oncologic standards and lower adoption. Prospective randomized trials with standardized endpoints remain necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: