Investigates how context selection impacts memory retrieval outcomes, suggesting implications for memory biases.
In a companion paper (Paper 12), we established that context quantity in retrieval-augmented generation follows a dose-response curve with model-specific therapeutic windows. This paper addresses the complementary question: does context selection method matter? We introduce wave-resonant retrieval, a four-dimensional scoring function combining intensity, temporal recurrence, phase coherence, and anti-saturation. On balanced data, resonance improves diversity by 24%. On production data (3,740 episodic memories, 78% concentrated in two emotion categories), resonance catastrophically fails: 0 wins and 140 losses across two independent implementations (GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6). We identify the mechanism—phase coherence amplifies the dominant class, creating a resonance monopoly—and extend the pharmacokinetic framework with a pharmacodynamic dimension: even at the optimal dose, the wrong selection method converts medicine into poison.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jo Myeongjun (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: