Analysis reveals bias in reporting Australian Rules Football, suggesting implications for journalism and sports culture.
Sport reporters strive for objectivity to legitimize their work, yet acknowledge their subjectivity in creating entertaining narratives. This objectivity–subjectivity tension has importance consequences for sports journalism, and in turn sporting organizations’ cultural and commercial success. This study examines Australian Rules Football reporting about home-team rivals Adelaide and Port Adelaide by South Australia’s only major newspaper, The Advertiser . We identify bias toward Adelaide across three levels of analysis and argue this bias is caused by commercial and ideological subjectivity. These findings are discussed in relation to the broader implications of structural bias in journalism and its political, economic, and societal consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fielding et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: