Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In a historical context the interface between two phases has played only a minor role in the physics of fluid dynamics. It is of course true that boundary conditions at interfaces, usually imposed as continuity of ve locity and stress, determine the field of a given flow; however, this is a more or less passive use of the interface that allows one to ignore the structure of the transition between two phases. When an interface has been assigned a more active role in flow processes, it generally has been assumed that one parameter, the interfacial (surface) tension, accounts for all mech anical phenomena (Young et al. 1 959, Levich & Krylov 1969). In these studies, kinematic effects of the interface were not considered, and the condition on the at interfaces was retained. The basic message of this article is that the interface is a region of small but finite thickness, and that dynamical processes occurring within this region lead not only to interfacial stresses but also to an apparent velocity that, on a macroscopic length scale, appears to be a violation of the no-slip condition. The existence of a slip at solid/fluid interfaces opens a class of flow problems not generally recognized by the fluid-dynamics community. Three previous articles in this series deal with flow caused by interactions between interfaces and external fields such as electrical potential, tem perature, and solute concentration. Melcher & Taylor ( 1969) and Levich & Krylov (1969) consider fluid/fluid interfaces where stresses produced at the interface by the external field dictate the flow. Saville ( 1977), on the other hand, discusses the action of an electric field on a charged solid/fluid interface and reviews the currently accepted model for electrophoretic
James Anderson (Sun,) studied this question.