Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 4, 2016Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Language of mechanisms: exam analysis reveals students' strengths, strategies, and errors when using the electron-pushing formalism (curved arrows) in new reactions

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AFAlison B. FlynnUniversity of OttawaRFRyan B. FeatherstoneUniversity of Ottawa

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Flynn et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df3608d5404a0bea59265chttps://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00126b
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The tip of the iceberg in organic chemistry classes: how do students deal with the invisible?2014 · 184 citations
  2. 2Ethical considerations of chemistry education research involving ‘human subjects’2014 · 86 citations
  3. 3From Source to Sink: Mechanistic Reasoning Using the Electron-Pushing Formalism2013 · 103 citations
  4. 4Students' understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts2011 · 106 citations
  5. 5Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”2010 · 585 citations