Cooked, diced chicken meat was dehydrated by various air‐ and freeze‐drying techniques. The dried material was evaluated to determine shear strength, friability, color, rehydration, surface area, porosity, density and pore size distribution. A Scanning Electron Microscope was employed to study effects of the drying process on meat fiber structure. We found that freeze‐drying produced a porous material with excellent rehydration properties. Air‐drying produced samples with less porosity and poorer rehydration. We concluded that porosity was the primary factor in rehydration potential and surface area and pore size distribution was less important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farkas et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: