Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Searching for IgG and IgM against the mycobacterial antigen A60 has been recognized as a potential diagnostic tool for pulmonary tuberculosis. The role of detection of anti-A60 IgA in improving diagnostic accuracy of serology is not well known. In this study we measured with ELISA serum levels of both anti-A60 IgG and IgA in 216 subjects. 88 healthy volunteers (44 PPD- and 44 PPD+), 44 patients suffering from nontuberculous lung disease and 15 subjects with healed pulmonary tuberculosis constituted the control population; 69 patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis (35 cavitary forms, 26 productive forms and 8 miliary forms) were examined. The sensitivity of IgG test was 73.9% in pulmonary tuberculosis (77.1% in cavitary forms, 65.4% in productive forms, 87.5% in miliary forms); the specificity of the test was 95.9%. For the IgA test we observed a sensitivity of 72.5% (74.3 in cavitary forms, 69.2% in productive forms, 75.0 in miliary forms) and a specificity of 93.9%. Combination of the two tests increased the sensitivity to 84.0% (+10.1% compared to IgG test, +11.5% compared to IgA test); the specificity decreased to 92.5% (-3.4% vs. IgG test; -1.4 vs. IgA test). In conclusion, the combined use of evaluation of anti-A60 IgG and IgA increases the accuracy of serological diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alifano et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: