What question did this study set out to answer?

Critique universally accepted quality standards from a qualitative viewpoint and propose domain-specific alternatives for rigorous qualitative inquiry.

September 1, 2001Management Decision

Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Critique universally accepted quality standards from a qualitative viewpoint and propose domain-specific alternatives for rigorous qualitative inquiry.
Conducted a conceptual critique of traditional scientific quality concepts applied to qualitative inquiry.
Developed a theoretical framework proposing tailored quality criteria to evaluate qualitative investigations.
Standard quality criteria fail to address the core methodological principles and epistemological needs of qualitative research.
Novel qualitative-specific concepts provide clearer benchmarks for securing rigor and methodological integrity in non-quantitative studies.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Theoretical analysis demonstrates limitations of conventional quality metrics in qualitative inquiry, highlighting the need for dedicated standards.

Cite This Study

Caroline Stenbacka (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dfec076324afb55d592df3 https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000005801

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Theoretical analysis demonstrates limitations of conventional quality metrics in qualitative inquiry, highlighting the need for dedicated standards.

Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider