Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of new protein-ligand scoring functions using machine learning algorithms, such as random forest, has been of significant interest. By efficiently utilizing expanded feature sets and a large set of experimental data, random forest based scoring functions (RFbScore) can achieve better correlations to experimental protein-ligand binding data with known crystal structures; however, more extensive tests indicate that such enhancement in scoring power comes with significant under-performance in docking and screening power tests compared to traditional scoring functions. In this work, to improve scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand docking functions simultaneously, we have introduced a Δvina RF parameterization and feature selection framework based on random forest. Our developed scoring function Δvina RF₂₀ , which employs 20 descriptors in addition to the AutoDock Vina score, can achieve superior performance in all power tests of both CASF-2013 and CASF-2007 benchmarks compared to classical scoring functions. The Δvina RF₂₀ scoring function and its code are freely available on the web at: https://www.nyu.edu/projects/yzhang/DeltaVina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: