Examines how the diagnostic journey affects caregivers’ quality of life in Angelman syndrome, suggesting areas for improved support.
Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare neurogenetic disease that severely impacts a person’s health and daily living, requiring lifelong specialist care. This places substantial demands on caregivers, leading to a decline in physical and mental health, financial strain, and reduced quality of life. This study examines the association between a diagnostic journey in Angelman syndrome and parents’ quality of life. A self-administered, anonymous, computer-assisted online survey of 120 caregivers was conducted between March and August 2024. The Polish version of the WHO Quality of Life-BREF and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being Scale were used. The collected information was imported into JASP 0.18.3. 54.2% of caregivers experienced difficulties in obtaining timely diagnoses, 51.6% reported receiving misdiagnoses, and 87.4% consulted several specialists before the correct diagnosis was confirmed. Many caregivers believed that a delayed diagnosis harmed their children’s health (31.7%) and resulted in unwarranted or inappropriate hospitalizations (18.3%), medical procedures (26.7%), and medications (16.7%). Caregivers struggled to access genetic counselling and psychological support. AS caregivers had lower quality of life scores compared to the national average across all domains, including social relationships (85.8%), physical health (80.8%), environmental (72.5%), and psychological (61.7%). Caregivers’ quality of life was associated with economic stability, gender, and the timing of diagnosis. There is a need for better access to genetic testing, a holistic healthcare approach, and comprehensive support services for caregivers, as well as reliable information, psychological support, financial assistance, and social services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domaradzki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: