Demonstrates how demand adjustment costs impact profits and consumer welfare during cost shocks in the fuel market.
This paper shows that, with demand-adjustment frictions, firms can increase short-run profits in the presence of cost shocks. Firms exploit short-term price inelasticity by balancing current markups against future demand. We further examine the incidence of temporary profit taxes and find that, due to dynamic price-setting, the classic neutrality result no longer holds: firms temporarily lower prices to shift profits across tax periods, thereby increasing consumer welfare. We use this model to compare a profit tax, a price cap, and a fuel discount to the case of no policy intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: