PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026AIP Advances0 citationsOpen Access

Dual objective optimization for energy release control in solid rocket motors

View Full Paper
SWShuwen WangNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityJXjinsheng XuNanjing University of Science and TechnologyZGZongtao GuoNanjing University of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • To develop a co-optimization framework for controlling energy release in solid rocket motors to prevent thrust overshoot and ensure safety.
  • Developed a nonlinear dynamic model coupling chamber-pressure transients and internal ballistics.
  • Designed an adaptive controller using a tracking-differentiator to manage throat-area changes.
  • Constructed a surrogate model using a dream optimization algorithm to characterize nonlinear mappings between parameters and performance metrics.
  • Applied a non-dominated sorting whale optimization algorithm combined with entropy-weighted TOPSIS to derive Pareto-optimal solutions.
  • Achieved a peak thrust overshoot of 239.56 N.
  • Attained a response time of 0.57 seconds.
  • Relative prediction errors for the optimization framework were below 6% against high-fidelity simulations.

Abstract

Pintle-based rapid throttling of variable-thrust solid rocket motors (VTSRMs) can induce thrust overshoot, jeopardizing structural integrity and mission safety. This paper proposes a novel dual-objective co-optimization framework for energy-release control, termed a pressure–thrust co-regulation strategy. The main contributions are as follows: (1) A nonlinear dynamic model that couples chamber-pressure transients and internal ballistics is developed, and the mechanism of thrust overshoot is theoretically revealed: it stems from a mismatch between rapid throat-area variation and the comparatively slower pressure response. (2) A tracking-differentiator (TD)-based adaptive controller is designed, in which the TD module smooths step commands to reduce the rate of throat-area change, and the adaptive control law self-tunes online to accelerate pressure response, thereby suppressing overshoot without sacrificing response speed. (3) A dream optimization algorithm-backpropagation surrogate model is constructed to characterize the nonlinear mapping between controller parameters (speed factor γ and feedback gain k1) and performance metrics (thrust overshoot and settling time), achieving relative prediction errors below 6% against high-fidelity simulations. (4) The non-dominated sorting whale optimization algorithm, a multi-objective optimization algorithm combined with entropy-weighted TOPSIS, is used to obtain the Pareto-optimal solution set and select a compromise solution (γ = 4.2749 × 107, k1 = 219), yielding a peak thrust overshoot of 239.56 N and a response time of 0.57 s. The proposed framework provides an implementable control pathway for high-precision and high-safety thrust modulation in VTSRMs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07d732f7e8953b7cbe5c4https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0315521
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper