PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 20267 citationsOpen Access

Burdick Crag Mass: A Substrate Wave Model for Galactic Rotation Curves Without Dark Matter — v4 with Quantified Neutrino Prediction and Tully-Fisher Recovery

View Full Paper
SBStephen Justin Senior Burdick

Key Points

  • This research aims to provide an alternative to dark matter through a substrate wave model for galactic rotation curves.
  • Classified 175 SPARC rotation curve galaxies using four global parameters without per-galaxy tuning.
  • Compared the substrate model's performance against NFW and MOND using reduced chi-squared metrics.
  • Predicted neutrino flavor gradients and analyzed binary mass transfer rates.
  • BCM model achieved a mean reduced chi-squared of 42.1, outperforming NFW (92.1) and MOND (1630.4).
  • In 29 galaxies, BCM won 13 comparisons with NFW and dominated in massive brackets.
  • Predicted neutrino flux surmounts IceCube's detection limits by 2-5 orders of magnitude for galaxies within 20 Mpc.

Abstract

Version 3. 0: A substrate-based phenomenological alternative to cold dark matter in which the dark matter signal is modeled as the energy maintenance budget of a pre-existing 2D spatial substrate. Using four global parameters (lambda=0. 1, kappa=2. 0, grid=256, layers=8) and zero per-galaxy tuning, we classify 175 SPARC rotation curve galaxies into six physically distinct substrate interaction states. On 29 representative galaxies, BCM achieves a mean reduced chi-squared of 42. 1 compared to NFW's 92. 1 (two fitted parameters per galaxy) and MOND's 1630. 4. The framework generates falsifiable predictions for IceCube/KM3NeT neutrino flavor gradients, Betelgeuse tachocline recovery, and binary mass transfer rates. All code and data: https: //github. com/Joy4joy4all/Burdick-Crag-Mass Version 4. 0: Preprint presenting a substrate wave model for galactic rotation curves using four frozen global parameters and zero per-galaxy tuning. Reduced chi-squared comparison against NFW and MOND on 29 SPARC galaxies: BCM wins 13/29 (mean χ²=42. 1 vs NFW 92. 1), dominates massive bracket 7/12 (avg χ²=62. 7 vs NFW 241. 8). MOND wins 0/29. The substrate maintenance luminosity scales as L_ν ~ vₘax³. 9, independently recovering the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (L ~ v⁴; Tully & Fisher 1977) from the same frozen parameters — this scaling was not an input. All 29 galaxies remain sub-Eddington (max L_ν/LEdd < 6×10⁻⁴). Predicted neutrino flux exceeds IceCube point-source sensitivity by 2-5 orders of magnitude for galaxies within 20 Mpc. All code and data publicly available on GitHub. Included, v1. 0 and v2. 0 drafts

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stephen Justin Senior Burdick (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07d732f7e8953b7cbe6d7https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19571033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Burdick Crag Mass: A Substrate Wave Model for Galactic Rotation Curves Without Dark Matter — v5 with Einstein Coupling, Null Pump Proof, and Boundary Dynamics2026
  2. 2Burdick Crag Mass: A Substrate Wave Model for Galactic Rotation Curves Without Dark Matter2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Burdick Crag Mass: A Substrate Wave Model for Galactic Rotation Curves Without Dark Matter — v6 with Full SPARC 175 Analysis, Amplitude Ablation, and Tully-Fisher Exponent Stability2026 · 6 citations
  4. 4Burdick Crag Mass: A Substrate Wave Model for Galactic Rotation Curves Without Dark Matter — v7 with Anchor Partition Regime Map, ROOT_REENTRY Anatomy, and Macro-Torsion Operator - Tully-Fisher Exponent Stability2026
  5. 5Burdick's Crag Mass: A Six-Class Substrate Topology Classification of Galactic Rotation Curves and Planetary Dynamo Scale-Invariance2026 · 10 citations