Retrospective study compares CyberKnife regimens for prostate cancer, indicating no significant outcome differences.
This retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcomes of two CyberKnife (CK) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimens in patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC). A total of 249 patients were treated, with 123 receiving 35 Gy in 5 fractions and 126 receiving 36 Gy in 4 fractions, with a median follow-up of 50 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, assessed using CTCAE Version 5.0. Secondary endpoints included 3-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). To address baseline imbalances between groups, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied. Acute grade 2 GU toxicities occurred in 19 patients (7.6%) and chronic grade 2 in 15 patients (6.0%). Acute and chronic grade 2 GI toxicities were rare, occurring in 3 (1.2%) and 2 (0.8%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in cumulative GU or GI toxicity rates between fractionation regimens either before or after IPTW adjustment. After IPTW, the 3-year BCRFS was 96.5% in the 5-fraction group and 96.8% in the 4-fraction groups (P = 0.571). The 3-year LRRFS rates were similarly favorable (99.2% vs. 100%). The 3-year DMFS was 100% in the 5-fraction group and 97.5% in the 4-fraction group (P = 0.058). Overall, CK-SBRT using 36 Gy in 4 fractions was well tolerated, with low rates of treatment-related toxicity and no statistically significant differences in oncologic outcomes between regimens. Longer follow-up is required to determine the long-term efficacy of this dose-escalation strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: