Develops a framework optimizing flood risk control in urban areas, suggesting effective spatial allocation is key for management.
High-density urban areas face a critical trade-off between limited land resources and intensifying flood risks. This study develops a grey-green infrastructure (GGI) optimization framework that integrates hazard–exposure–vulnerability (H-E-V) risk assessment, surrogate modelling, and NSGA-III to simultaneously minimize cost, maximize flood control, and enhance water environmental benefits. The Suqian City case study reveals: (1) Grey-green coupling significantly outperforms single green infrastructure (GI), providing an additional 7.07–23.34 percentage points in flood risk control rate (FRCR). While GI reaches a performance bottleneck at 78.59% FRCR under extreme events, the GGI configuration maintains a high efficiency of >92.74%. (2) Risk-informed spatial targeting effectively reclassifies urban vulnerability. Under a 20-year return period, high-risk and medium-high risk areas are reduced by 80.99% and 52.15%, respectively. The validated surrogate models ensure high optimization efficiency with R2 values exceeding 0.85. This framework provides a methodologically transferable decision-support tool for sponge city construction, demonstrating that strategic spatial allocation is as vital as infrastructure capacity for urban flood risk management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: