Findings reveal that the 4-day OCD treatment sustains its positive outcomes for a year, indicating long-term benefits.
The Bergen 4-day treatment (B4DT) for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a concentrated form of exposure and response prevention that has been implemented at the Icelandic Anxiety Centre. The aim of the present study was to assess 12-month results of 86 participants undertaking the treatment. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) was administered at pre-, post-, and 3- and 12-month follow-up, accompanied by measures on generalised anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), and functional impairment (WSAS). The mean pre-treatment score on Y-BOCS was 30.5 ( SE =0.5), the post-treatment score was 10.7 ( SE =0.4), and the 12-month follow-up score was 11.5 ( SE =0.9). There was no significant difference in Y-BOCS scores from post-treatment to 3- and 12-month follow-up, which indicates that treatment gains were maintained over time. Functional impairment, along with symptoms of anxiety and depression, decreased significantly from pre- to post-treatment, with further reductions in functional impairment observed at the 12-month follow-up. All participants completed treatment, and at 12-month follow-up, 83.7% had responded and 67.4% recovered. Among the participants that had responded or remitted at post-treatment, 22% had a worse outcome at 12-month follow-up, but 54% of the participants in the response or no change categories at post-treatment had a better outcome at follow-up. These results support the effectiveness and long-term benefits of the B4DT when implemented outside of its country of origin. Key learning aims (1) The Bergen 4-day treatment (B4DT) is a highly intensive format of exposure and response prevention (ERP) for OCD. (2) Treatment gains from the B4DT for OCD are sustained for at least 12 months, with 67% of patients remaining recovered and 84% showing improvement. (3) Approximately half of those who do not fully benefit initially experience further improvement by the 12-month follow-up. (4) Drop-out rates are negligible, which is unusual for exposure and response prevention. (5) The B4DT demonstrates effectiveness beyond its country of origin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davíðsdóttir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: