Analysis reveals limited production cost benefits from GST cuts for Maharashtra's small sugarcane and horticulture producers, implying structural barriers persist.
This study examines the economic impact of 2025 GST rate reductions on agro-processing in Maharashtra, India, specifically assessing effects on production costs, farmer incomes, and state revenues among small sugarcane and horticulture producers. Amid Maharashtra's projected 7.9% GSDP growth for 2025-26, contrasted by agriculture's 3.4% expansion, the reforms lowered GST on refined sugar, processed fruits/vegetables, and fish products from 12% to 5%, targeting cost savings of 6-7% for 50 lakh smallholders with holdings under 2 hectares (Economic Survey of Maharashtra 2025-26; PIB India "GST Reforms 2025"). Utilizing secondary data from economic surveys, government releases, and sectoral reports, the analysis compares pre- and post-reform indicators, including input-output ratios, GST collections, and income metrics. Results indicate limited benefits for marginal farmers: burdensome compliance requirements (e.g., invoicing, e-way bills) and ineligibility for Input Tax Credit on high-GST inputs like pesticides (18%) and diesel negated output-side relief (ClearTax "Impact of GST"; Cashflo). Additional constraints of 6-15% post-harvest losses, water scarcity, and supply chain disparities further constrained gains, while initial state revenue shortfalls of 2-3% raised fiscal concerns (The Week "GST 2.0's quiet bias"). Findings reveal structural barriers undermining reform efficacy, perpetuating Agri-sector imbalances. Policy recommendations include targeted exemptions, digital compliance tools, and ITC access for smallholders to promote equitable growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhanvin Premal Shroff (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: