PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Educational Administration Quarterly0 citations

Helping the Cause or Fanning the Flames? County Council Involvement in a Post-PICS School Desegregation Effort

View Full Paper
KBKayla Bill

Key Points

  • The aim was to investigate how county council involvement in redistricting affects school desegregation efforts in Howard County.
  • Analyzed county council actions and decisions related to school desegregation.
  • Examined community responses to council-led redistricting efforts.
  • Investigated the council's promises regarding housing segregation.
  • Council involvement was largely symbolic rather than effective.
  • Community resistance intensified due to council actions, undermining desegregation.
  • Redistricting plans resulted in further school segregation instead of progress.

Abstract

General-purpose government actors (e.g., mayors) have become increasingly involved in education since the late twentieth century. But while education policy has moved from education-specific to general-purpose government arenas, school desegregation policy has moved in the opposite direction. General-purpose government actors’ involvement was key to reducing segregation from the mid- to late-twentieth century; however, Supreme Court cases leading up to Parents Involved in Community Schools (PICS) have left desegregation in district actors’ hands. This paper explores one county council's involvement in a recent attempt to desegregate schools by redistricting, or redrawing school attendance boundaries, in Howard County, Maryland—a unique case that presents an opportunity to learn whether the involvement of local government officials, who are well-positioned to support these efforts, could spark progress toward desegregation in the post-PICS era. I find that the council's efforts to promote desegregation in the Howard County Public School System were more symbolic than substantive. Council members’ actions contributed to community resistance that led the school board to enact a redistricting plan that would have further segregated schools, and the council failed to make good on their promise to simultaneously address housing segregation. Ultimately, this case serves as a call to local officials and school district leaders to create and capitalize on opportunities for collaborative, cross-sector desegregation efforts, and sheds light on the sources of political power and influence strategies that may be required to bring those efforts to fruition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kayla Bill (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1ce3b5cdc762e9d857467https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x261440171
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Proximity vs. equity: Policy actors’ decision-making on attendance zone boundaries in a suburban school district2025
  2. 2Urban governance and public education: Intergovernmental relations and school renewal in Oklahoma City2026
  3. 3Community Spirit Despite Unequal Resources: The Segregated Education of Blacks in the Howard County Public School System, 1935-19652021
  4. 4Realizing the Solidarity Dividend: A New Story for Educational Leadership2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Navigating Community and Legislative Tensions: How a Superintendent Advocates for Educational Equity in a Changing Political Context2025