Demonstrates improved manufacturing efficiency of pure tungsten using high-power electron beam PBF-EB, indicating significant advancements for tungsten applications.
The exceptional properties of tungsten make it a very attractive material for advanced applications, however, it is challenging to process. Research on electron beam powder bed fusion (PBF-EB) of tungsten is limited but promising. Previous work has mostly focused on low beam powers and scan velocities, which limits the efficiency of the manufacturing process. A higher processing speed is required for economical production of large tungsten components. This paper studies PBF-EB processing of pure tungsten with a power of 5 kW using a Freemelt ONE and scan velocities of several meters per second, making use of the full capabilities of PBF-EB technology. The required energy input for preheating of the powder bed to achieve dense and crack-free bulk samples is investigated in detail. Then, to optimize the heating energy input, a localized heating strategy is introduced where only the sample cross section is heated after general preheating. Hereby, the required energy input for achieving crack-free tungsten was decreased by 50%. Furthermore, the layer time was reduced from initially 44 s to 30 s, since only a short cooling step was required to avoid overheating of the machine. Finally, dense and crack-free tungsten blocks with 80 mm height were successfully fabricated, thus verifying the applicability of high-power PBF-EB for efficiently creating solid tungsten parts. Microstructural and hardness analysis along the build height revealed a columnar grain structure with a slight grain coarsening and corresponding decrease in hardness towards the top of the build, consistent with the evolving thermal history of the process. These findings highlight a path for enhancing the process efficiency and energy utilization in additive manufacturing of tungsten.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baseer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: