Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework models recursive uncertainty in preferences, indicating a unified representation of ambiguity.
We develop a categorical framework for modeling recursive uncertainty over preferences in decision theory. Classical models of ambiguity allow for uncertainty over outcomes or beliefs but usually rely on finite or exogenously truncated representations when agents face uncertainty about their own evaluative criteria. Given that such recursive preference formation generates an infinite hierarchy that may not stabilize at any finite level, we introduce a contractive von Neumann–Morgenstern utility functor on a category of compact metric spaces enriched over complete metric spaces, and establish the existence and uniqueness of its canonical fixed point. This fixed point is interpreted as a universal preference space that contains all levels of recursive ambiguity in a consistent and metrically stable form. We further extend the construction to multi-utility representations and discuss its relation to existing models of ambiguity and universal choice spaces. This framework offers a minimal unified representation of recursive preference structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arvanitis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: