Genomic analysis reveals virulence factors in non-toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1, suggesting new infection risks.
Vibrio cholerae remains a global health threat, driven by epidemic strains and sporadic infections associated with non-toxigenic lineages. We report the genomic characterization of a V. cholerae O1 Ogawa isolate (V86/24) recovered from a human case in Brazil (2024) with no travel history. We performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and in silico analyses, including SNP-based phylogenetic and pangenome analyses (V86/24 + 62 public genomes; total N = 63), resistome, and virulome. The isolate showed intermediate susceptibility to imipenem but was susceptible to other tested antimicrobials. WGS identified V86/24 as sequence type ST170, lineage L3b.2, sublineage MX-2. It harbors pathogenicity islands VPI-1 and VPI-2 but lacks seventh-pandemic-associated islands (VSP-1, VSP-2) and classical CTXΦ-associated toxin genes (ctxA, ctxB, ace, zot). Pangenome analysis revealed 4,485 gene clusters; V86/24 carried eight unique clusters primarily mapped to a prophage-like region. Resistome profiling identified the intrinsic varG metallo-β-lactamase gene. The virulome retained alternative virulence and colonization factors, including TCP/ACF, RTX/MARTX, and an extensive type VI secretion system. Phylogenetically, V86/24 clusters with ST170 isolates circulating in the Americas, distinctly separated from seventh-pandemic lineages. Non-toxigenic V. cholerae O1 lineages can cause human infection. These findings underscore the critical need for integrated genomic surveillance, including pangenome profiling, beyond classical toxigenicity markers to detect emerging risks prior to epidemic spread.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: