PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Association of donor heavy alcohol use with graft failure after deceased-donor liver transplantation stratified by donor sex and macrosteatosis in the OPTN/UNOS registry

SHSangbin HanVAVatche G. AgopianJSJustin Steggerda

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the impact of donor heavy alcohol intake on graft failure after liver transplantation, considering donor sex and macrosteatosis.
  • Retrospective cohort study utilizing the OPTN/UNOS registry for liver transplants from 2000 to 2023.
  • Included 29,170 adult liver transplant recipients and assessed donor alcohol history and macrosteatosis.
  • Utilized Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations while adjusting for various covariates.
  • Overall, donor heavy alcohol intake was not associated with increased graft failure (HR = 0.96).
  • Donor macrosteatosis was linked to a higher risk of graft failure (HR = 1.07).
  • Among female donors, heavy alcohol history correlated with a lower graft failure risk (HR = 0.87), unlike male donors.

Abstract

A subset of deceased liver donors have a history of heavy alcohol intake. We evaluated whether donor heavy alcohol history is associated with graft failure after liver transplantation (LT) and whether associations differ by donor sex and macrosteatosis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the OPTN/UNOS registry, including 29,170 adult LT recipients (2000–2023). The exposure was heavy alcohol intake (> 2 drinks/day). The primary outcome was graft failure. Associations were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for donor, recipient, and transplant covariates. The proportion of donors with heavy alcohol history increased over time (2000–2007, 19.0%; 2008–2015, 20.3%; 2016–2023, 22.3%). In multivariable analyses, donor heavy alcohol history was not associated with graft failure overall (HR = 0.96 0.90–1.03, P = 0.249). Donor macrosteatosis was independently associated with higher risk (HR = 1.07 1.01–1.13, P = 0.020). Associations differed by donor sex: among female donors, heavy alcohol history was associated with lower graft failure risk (HR = 0.87 0.77–0.98, P = 0.010), whereas no association was observed among male donors (P = 0.802). The lower risk seen with female donors was not present when donor livers had macrosteatosis (P = 0.271). In conclusion, donor heavy alcohol history was not associated with increased graft failure risk overall. Notably, grafts from female donors with a heavy alcohol history were associated with lower failure risk, an apparent advantage that was not observed in the presence of macrosteatosis. No association was observed among male donors. These findings suggest sex- and liver-quality–dependent heterogeneity in the relationship between donor alcohol history and post-transplant outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Han et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf985cdc762e9d85878ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48596-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The impact of macro‐ and micro‐steatosis on the outcomes of patients who undergo liver transplant: Analysis of the <scp>UNOS‐STAR</scp> database2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Pediatric liver transplant outcomes: A comparative analysis of steatotic donor grafts2025
  3. 3Comparative Post-Transplant Outcomes in Alcohol-Related Liver Disease and Non-Alcohol Steatohepatitis: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Study2026
  4. 4Graft Steatosis and Donor Diabetes Mellitus Additively Impact on Recipient Outcomes After Liver Transplantation—A European Registry Study2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Female Donor Gender is Associated to a Decrease in Post-liver Transplant Survival of Male Recipients Independently to Donor and Recipient Anthropometric Differences2024