This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Dmitry Yashchenko’s Comparison of the Acta Universi hypothesis with string theory in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study investigates the conceptual structure of the Acta Universi (AUfield) hypothesis, especially its treatment of dark energy, entropy, nonlocality, gravity, cognition, and consciousness, and places it in systematic confrontation with the modal axioms of TO. The paper argues that Yashchenko’s proposal is philosophically and cosmologically relevant because it shifts the horizon of unification from extra-dimensional vibrational geometry to an informational-entropic archive of irreversible events. At the same time, the article shows that, under the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity, the AUfield hypothesis faces important tensions: it does not begin from Nothing as a primitive mathematical essence, does not fully ground the individuation of elements, leaves unresolved questions concerning compositional genealogy, and tends to blur the distinction between informational registration and full ontological existence. The study also articulates the discussion with the phenomenic elements of TO, the Inductor Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. In this way, the article proposes that Acta Universi may be read not as a sufficient absolute foundation, but as a secondary phenomenological cosmology or informational description of late-stage cosmic organization, provided that it is disciplined by the modal ontology of TO. This analytical article was written with analytical support from ChatGPT. KeywordsTheory of Objectivity; Acta Universi; Dmitry Yashchenko; string theory; modal ontology; critical-propositional analysis; dark energy; entropy; nonlocality; gravity; consciousness; cosmology; information; phenomenology; Zenodo.
Cabannas et al. (Wed,) studied this question.