Initial evaluation of the SMUFA reveals valid functional categories in university students, suggesting insights into social media behaviors.
To establish a behavioral framework for understanding social media use, we assessed the validity of the Social Media Use Functional Assessment (SMUFA), a survey instrument assessing functional categories of use (i.e., attention, escape, sensory, and tangible). Participants included 357 university students. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and after reducing items, a three-factor model (attention, escape, and sensory and tangible) identified a good fit. We also examined associations between the SMUFA and two other established social media scales. Total SMUFA scores generally correlated with the Social Media Disorder Scale (r = .48) and the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (r = .66) and had a weaker correlation with the Social Media Engagement Questionnaire (r = .31). Practical and conceptual issues related to assessing problematic social media use are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malkin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: