Systematic evaluation of vision-language models enhances failure detection in robotics, suggesting improved safety in automation.
Vision-language models (VLMs) offer transformative potential for robotics, but their deployment is constrained by performance limitations. In safety-critical manipulation, a model must recognize its own limitations to prevent a catastrophic failure. We conduct a systematic study of VLMs for robotic failure detection, evaluating six architectures on real-world trajectories. We put forward a decision-making process that allows a VLM to evaluate whether it can successfully complete a task, and if not, pause its operation and hand over the task to human operators. Our results show that well-calibrated VLMs can be trustworthy partners that know exactly when to ask for help.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: