This article investigates hop and 2-hop domination numbers in honeycomb and butterfly networks, indicating important bounds for network design.
This article investigates hop and 2-hop domination numbers, each defined by the minimum of its hop (2-hop) dominating sets on the honeycomb and butterfly networks, which have enormous applications in chemistry, engineering, parallel computing, etc. Furthermore, we obtain an upper bound on a regular honeycomb mesh network HC(n,k) and a lower bound for an n-dimensional butterfly network BF(n) with (n+1) levels/stages. The cases in which these determined bounds are tight are also explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sankaran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: