This work demonstrates improved efficiency and reduced defects in inverted perovskite solar cells through molecular modification, suggesting significant advancements in solar technology.
Defects on the surface and at grain boundaries of perovskite films induce non-radiative recombination and deteriorate device performance in perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Eliminating these defects is therefore essential to improving efficiency. In this work, 5-nitro-2-(3-pyridyl)benzimidazole (NPBIm), a commercially available small molecule featuring a donor–π–acceptor push–pull architecture, is employed as a surface modifier for inverted PSCs. The pyridyl and benzimidazole nitrogen atoms coordinate with undercoordinated Pb 2+ ions, while the nitro group contributes to interfacial dipole formation, as supported by the observed work-function shift and UPS-derived energy-level realignment. NPBIm treatment after perovskite crystallization is associated with improved crystallinity, enlarged grain size (from 250.22 to 278.37 nm), and reduced defect density (from 1.32 × 10 16 to 1.08 × 10 16 cm −3 ). The slope of the Voc–ln(I) curve decreases from 1.39 kT/q to 1.24 kT/q, and carrier lifetime extends from 64.94 to 255.79 ns, indicating suppressed non-radiative recombination. The champion device achieves a PCE of 21.28%, surpassing the 19.56% of the control. Water contact angle tests indicate improved hydrophobicity and stability, with 65% efficiency retained after 400 h of ambient storage compared with 42% for the untreated device. These results suggest that NPBIm functions as an effective bifunctional interfacial modifier, concurrently passivating defects and optimizing band alignment in PSCs. • NPBIm tunes crystal growth, reduces defects, yielding compact, crystalline films. • Lewis-base and dipole alignment lower work function, enhancing extraction. • NPBIm boosts carrier dynamics and PCE to 21.28% vs 19.56%. • NPBIm passivation boosts PSC performance, cuts J–V hysteresis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: